Catherine Fink - Senior Managing Editor
Catherine Fink - Senior Managing Editor
Catherine is a part-time 4L who grew up in Colorado and spent her 20s in Los Angeles. The contrast between her outdoors-based childhood and the urban jungle of her young adulthood made a strong impression and reinforced Catherine's interest in environmentalism and environmental justice. She earned her B.A. in English graduating magna cum laude from Colorado College, and later went on to earn her M.F.A. in Writing & Poetics from Naropa University. Catherine has taught students in grade 6-community college for 19 years and is now studying environmental law and movement lawyering because nothing else she does for the public good really matters if we don't confront the climate crisis! In addition to teaching and going to law school, Catherine enjoys playing outside with her three kids and spouse, running half-marathons, acting as a Democratic Party precinct captain, and serving as a Longmont Library board member.
Catherine’s Articles
Both surging interest and investment in nuclear energy as a way to meet net zero goals and to diminish the worst effects of climate change, as well as the US commitment at COP28 to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050, are reasons to pause and examine how “green” nuclear power really is. It is important to consider the carbon life cycle of a typical, light-water reactor nuclear power plant (NPP). If nuclear energy is not truly lower in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over that life cycle than other power sources, then nations choosing it as a way to meet legally-binding Paris Agreement NDCs regarding GHG reduction requirements may open themselves up to climate litigation.
Indigenous peoples’ lands and territories constitute at least 28% of the global land surface. Indigenous people represent 5,000 unique cultures worldwide, and they protect 80% of the world’s remaining biodiversity. At the same time, despite having contributed the least to climate change, many indigenous people will experience the most drastic impacts from it if humans don’t ramp up renewable energy production rapidly and worldwide. Yet is it possible to do so without repeating the atrocities of the past or worsening indigenous peoples’ circumstances in the present?
Water and solar energy are the building blocks of life—especially in the arid West. An emerging technology takes advantage of both has the potential to provide 50% of the world’s ongoing energy needs through a clean, green new technology: Floating photovoltaics (FPVs). Alternatively known “aquavoltaics”1 (AVs), “floating solar arrays,” or “floatovoltaics,” FPVs can increase sustainable energy production while decreasing the costs and ecological concerns related to terrestrial solar arrays.
Is the right to a clean environment a protected human right? According to the United Nations and a collection of youth plaintiffs in lawsuits across the U.S., the answer is yes. If so, then the door is opening to a new approach to climate justice litigation, based on pre-existing treaties and state constitutions, that could change the way environmental justice advocates approach their work. This spring and summer, several important cases will be tried that could set the precedent for whether or not this approach will work.
“It’s like Dr. Seuss down there,” according to Diva Amon, a scientist who studies the marine floor, describing the incredible sea life and geologic formations in an area known as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), which may soon be opened to the first-ever deep sea mining of polymetallic nodules.
What happens when technology made for the good goes bad? Unfortunately, solar panel waste is a growing problem as photovoltaics gain traction in our energy economy. According to NREL, these “decommissioned PV modules could total 1 million tons of waste in the United States by 2030, or 1% of the world’s e-waste. This presents not only waste management concerns but also opportunities for materials recovery and secondary markets.”